Big Things

                    Digital Memories is going to change the way people save memories, share information and manage their time.  After reading this article I believe that this new wave of technology is either going to make society more lazy, or help them organize their lives and make life easier on everyone.  It is going to help people remember things easier, store memories and pictures longer and in less space, but it also serves a few more purposes than that.  For example it will help people manage their time, provide them with more security and a few other personal features. 

            “Today’s low-cost abundant storage makes it possible to record most life experiencesinvolving audio, video, and other types of data.  Future networking promises to allow us to view and manage personal information from any device, any place, at any time. Incorporating compact, inexpensive, self-activating sensors, these technologies promise to let us capture most of our lives easily and passively, so we no longer have to interrupt our interactions

with one another to shoot movies or take photos (Czerwinski, 46).”  Now, I feel two ways about this; its either going to make our lives easier and less cluttered or it is going to make us lazy and only clutter our lives more.  I can see this digital memory device as something that can help people remember where they put things, save memories and pictures on their digital memory rather than in scrap books, which will save time and space.  But, is it possible that this can also be something that makes us even lazier and too self dependent on our device?  I feel that this device is made only for certain people, such as the motivated and already somewhat organized individual.  Of course to any downside, there is an upside, which is exactly what this device offers.

            There are a few things that people can definitely benefit from having a digital life.  For example, “Memory . Finding things (such as keys and eyeglasses); replaying learning and teaching experiences; reviewing research and travel; remembering names of people and places; and reviewing discussions and meetings…share personal experience, personal reflection and analysis, time management and security (Czerwinski, 47),” are all good quality aspects of a digital life.  But, I feel that I do not need every one of those things in my life, or need to use the digital memories to help me in those areas.   I feel that paying all that money for a device that I find not as useful as the next person wouldn’t be beneficial to me. 

            “Keeping everything may have negative side effects (such as distracted attention, information overload, and less-effective searching and browsing) [6]. However, there is a difference between keeping everything and making everything visible; a technological solution can hide details and deletions, thus eliminating clutter and the oppressive task of managing it while still retaining the records for future use. Although it seems tempting to label many artifacts of everyday life as disposable, in practice it is often impossible to predict exactly which items in our lives we might value or need in the future (Czerwinski, 48).”  These are the negative side effects that I was curious about and wondering if the digital memory device was going to be useful or just baggage.  But, depending on what you use it for, the device seems to be on the line of everything you need to organize your life, or completely useless.

            For myself, this device would most likely be completely useless, because I like doing things on my own, organize everything the way I like to have it, and I like knowing and handling pictures and memories, rather than store it on the computer or in a digital memory device.  I think that it is a great tool and it is going to help turn some people’s lives around, but for this guy right here, it just seems useless. 

Works Cited 

Czerwinski, M., Gage, D.W., Gemmell, J.,
Marshall, C., Pérez-Quiñonesis, M., Skeels, et al (2006). Digital memories in an era of ubiquitous computing and abundant storage. Communications of the ACM, 49(1), 45-50.

               Blogging has come a long way and has been growing at a rapid pace.  It has evolved into a great communication tool, as well a tool used for expressing opinions, ranging from politics to sports and entertainment.  Many bloggers begin their webblogs as a means for expression and to express their ideas to the public’s eye.  But, even for some they start out small and evolve into something much bigger than what they had anticipated.  For some people they begin small and wind up being a major blogging site with a lot of money.

              “…blogging paid off handsomley.  Last fall AOL bought Weblogs, Inc., which includes his blog Engadget for $25 million.  “I didn’t intend to become a millionaire,” says Rojas, “But I wound up there anyway (Thompson, 126).”  In Rojas’ case, he had a blog set up on Weblogs, Inc., then AOL purchased Weblogs from them and instantly he became a millionaire.  This is how quickly blogs have evolved and became a main stream communication tool.  One minute you can find yourself blogging for fun about your favorite celebrity, next minute thousands of people are linking to your blog to see what you have posted. 

               But, as quickly as you hit it big in the blog world, you can easily lose your audience if you don’t stay on top of it.  John Battelle is a perfect example, of an experienced blogger with a lot of hits on his blog who almost lost a few of his viewers.  “And suddenly I was getting all these emails going, “If you dont get your sh*t together, Im out of here” he recalls.  He stayed up late that night frantically adding posts.”  “If you start sucking” he says, “Its through (Thompson, 126).”

               It may be easy to lose and audience, but is also just as easy to gain an audience to your blog.  “If you launch a witty blog in a sexy niche, if youre good at scrounging for news nuggets, and if youre dedicated enough to post around the clock, well there is nothing  seperating you from the big successful blogger…(Thompson,28).”  It is just a matter of finding something you are pationate about and enjoying writing about to gain an audience because there is people out there who are interested in the same things you are, and as long as you stay on top of your blogging, you can gain a large audience. 

               Then once you begin to attract viewers, you need to stay on top of your blogging and incorporate many links outside of your blog.  Links that lead outside your blog and backup what you are saying helps solidify what you are saying.  Then, “A single mention from an A-lister can provoke “” firehoses of traffic”…that can help pluck a neophyte blog out of obscurity (Thompson, 35).”  In essence, this is saying that big blog sites, will lead to thousands of viewers.

               Blogging is growing everyday, and when big corporations like AOL are purchasing blog sites, then you know that blogging has taken off.  Becoming the big time blogger is only an A-lister mention away or a purchase away.  But keeping an audience and attracting viewers is a lot of work and requires a lot of attention. 

Works Cited

Thompson, C. (2006).  Blogs to Riches.  New York Magazine, February 20. (Pgs 26-35).

                Video gaming has evolved at a rapid pace both as a video console and on the computer.  It has children to grown men and women playing fantasy games on either a Television or a computer at an unbelievably high rate.  But, why and how do so many people get hooked into this world of fantasy that is turned on and off by the click of a mouse or a flick of a switch.  There are many reasons for people of all ages to explore the world of video games such as, fantasy or exploration, overcome social restraints, self gratification and many others.

There are many different kinds of video games, from educational to athletic to violent.  But different games appeal to different people, and that’s why they come out with so many different games. “Computer games are much like candy, comic books, and cartoons. All four activities provide intense or exaggerated experiences. Whether they use sugar, exclamation points, or animated explosions, the goal is the same: to provide extreme experiences (Crawford, Preface).”  And that is what video games do, they provide video gamers with experiences such as Halo, which is in first player mode and you go around carrying a gun, shooting at your enemy which are other alien monsters.  But, people play this game to give themselves a sense of the fantasy world.  “A common function of games is to provide a means of overcoming social restrictions, at least in fantasy. Many games place the player in a role that would not be socially acceptable in real life, such as a pirate or a thief (Crawford, Chap 2).”

Video games have developed rapidly and are continuing too very quickly.  The graphics are getting more real, the games are getting more life like, and on the flip side, are getting more into the fantasy world.  But speaking as a video gamer, there are many reasons why I like to play.  First, it’s something competitive, where you have a goal or something to overcome, and it gives you a great feeling when you finally reach your goal.  Secondly, for the fantasy world experiences, where games bring you to a world you either don’t want to go in real life, or a world that just doesn’t exist.  It offers a sense of excitement and freshness to your gaming world. 

Since I first started playing video games when I was younger, the world of gaming has changed dramatically, every single year, new games, better graphics, better consoles, more features.  Now, video games, come in life like games, with a DVD player, or a CD player and many other features such as going online and playing other video gamers from around the globe.  The gaming world has expanded very quickly and is going to continue to do so.

Works Cited 

Optional: Mathes, A. (2004). Folksonomies: Cooperative classification and communication through shared metadata.

It’s easy to say that what we hear and believe is the truth, especially if it comes from television or newspapers.  Why wouldn’t we believe what a award winning journalist of the New York Times has to say about the war in
Iraq, or other issues that these reporters talk about so diligently.  We take what they write to heart and believe what they say, then go ahead and pass them off as our thoughts and feelings to our friends or teachers.  But what is really is going happening on the outside world, isn’t necessarily being told in your local or national newspaper.  After reading Matheson’s article on weblog’s and online journalism, I came to the conclusion that what reporters write in a newspaper and what they post on their weblog can be completely different and contradicting.  Many reporters write what they do because they have to adhere to certain guidelines, but it does not necessarily display their true feelings.

            “A number of prominent news-related weblogs are kept by professional journalists and a key discourse in their understanding of ‘blogging’ appears to be that of expressing experiences which find no outlet in conventional reporting (Matheson, 451).”  It seems to be that many professional journalists have their own blogs to write opinion pieces, add hyperlinks or photos to a page, and their views they express in their newspapers or on television, differ slightly from what they really believe.  One can only assume that this happens because of restrictions put on them and what they can say in a newspaper.  “The implications of such reorientations of the way in which knowledge is constructed between journalist and user extend beyond weblogs and indeed beyond online journalism.  A number of senior journalists have argued that too many readers are dissatisfied with the way in which the news makes claims to knowledge (Matheson, 456).”

            “Online journalism is regarded by many commentators as a site where outmoded and unsatisfactory news reporting traditions might be revised and renewed (Matheson, 443-444).”  It seems as though a new day and age is coming where you can find more reliable news on people’s personal weblog’s than you can on news websites.  Now this may not be the truth, but it seems as though reporters and journalists like letting their views heard on their personal weblog’s more so than in their articles they write in their papers. 

            Online weblogging has come a long way, and continues to expand and grow each day, where more and more people are finding their way onto their own personal weblog.  But is it just a matter of time before people begin to find their way to weblogs rather than news websites to find out what is happening in this world?  What is more reliable, the truth and opinions of people, or a well known news site?  The question remains unanswered and it becomes and ever growing problem for news sites

Works Cited

Matheson, D. (2004). Weblogs and the epistemology of the news: some trends in online journalism.  New Media and Society, 6(4). 443-468.

My name is Pat Egan, and I am a 5th year student here at Quinnipiac.  I recieved my undergrad degree in Public Relations with a minor in Marketing last May.  I am taking two other grad courses along with this one in hopes to get my masters by the end of 2007.  I am also a member of the Quinnipiac Baseball team, and will be finishing out my last year of eligibility come this spring then I have hopes to continue playing after college with dreams of playing professional ball.  I also think Quinnipiac is a great school where I recieved an excellent education and I would recommend this school to anyone.   If my dreams do not work out with baseball, then I will try pursuing a career as a Sports Event Planner.

Welcome to WordPress.com. This is your first post. Edit or delete it and start blogging!